Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Response to AIA Report on Integrated Practice:


Response to AIA Report on Integrated Practice:

BIM software has further pushed the discipline of architecture, engineering, and allied fields into the future. It is a necessary tool to know and from experience, no architecture firm seems to be hiring without it.

The software has become necessary because of its collaborative effects. The author of the article states that, “an important result of modeling all the construction systems in a building is that coordination among the different building trades becomes much simpler than it is currently.” Subcontractors, engineers, architects, and interior designers are able to simultaneously edit and change one model. It allows the kinks and pitfalls of collaboration to come out before ground is ever broken. In later versions of BIM, there won’t be a need for mistakes because the building has already been built and tested in a virtual space. Chuck Eastman recognizes this by stating, “On-site work is then much quicker, with greater quality control.” The model tells the whole story from the piping in the mechanical equipment to the detailing of the truss. This is what is pushing the field forward.

However, at the end of the article, Eastman brings up a great vulnerability of the product. “I will not be surprised to see ‘signature component’ designs for kitchens and bathrooms, [such as] the Julia Child Kitchen, the Britney Spears Necessarium…”. Eventually, everything is the world can be modeled and cataloged in BIM software. By creating continuous streamlined design and ‘standard components’, such as a kitchen or bathroom, the software begins to take design decisions away from the architect. With the ability to drag and drop any object or space into your model, you are effectively relieving yourself of any creative decision. At that point, you aren’t designing, you are shopping at Wal-Mart. It takes trial and error, thought, and long nights to create Architecture, and it could be a sad day for the field if we ever get to the point of ‘signature spaces or components’. We don’t need streamlined, ‘lazy’ architecture; we need a collaborative Architecture.

Overall, I look forward to the future of BIM. It aids in quality control and promotes collaboration amongst the disciplines to give only a few examples. It promotes a collaborative Architecture, one where many professions can provide input and designs can be tested in a virtual space. It also can promote a lazy architecture as well. With streamlined components and ‘signature spaces’, design becomes less educated and moves closer to the great strip malls of America. By dragging and dropping any space into your model, the designer is stripped of design. Only time can tell which side the field is pushed towards.  

Probe 1

Below are the three photo montages created for Probe 1 using Revit and Photoshop.



I did my best to skew the photos to fit my model, but it didn't always work. Some of them seem to match in place, and in others, they don't. I had to export many different views in Revit to try to get them right.