Response to Integrated Practice 1:
In his article, Thom Mayne describes the field of
Architecture as pushed forward because of advancing computer technology. He
states, “My office doesn’t resemble what it did fifteen years ago… Different
staff, different skill sets, different time sequences, different services.” Because
of BIM, firms are able to understand spaces, sequences, arrangements, program
grouping all from within one digital format. We aren’t describing what we want
to build through drawings; we are actually building and inhabiting it before the
building is physically realized.
His most provocative statement has to deal with 2-D
drawings. “I haven’t drawn a plan for five years. I go to schools now that are
still drawing plans and sections and I have no idea what to talk about.” He isn’t
saying that the plan is dead or that the section is dead. He is stating that all 2-D drawings are dead.
Three-dimensional modeling breaks the designer out of the 2-D constraints and
opens up a realm of possibility. With BIM, you can realize and create spaces
that were never possible with two dimensional drawings because of the
limitations. You are now designing, creating and making in 3-D and simply
describing your model with 2-D drawings. Simply put, BIM and three dimensional
modeling “represents a new totality”.
I don’t know if two dimensional drawing is dead. We can
learn a lot about design by inspecting the plan, section and elevation. Sometimes
it can simplify how we understand a particularly complex arrangement of spaces
or how some spaces seemingly flow through a building. I find the most helpful
representation is a hybrid of two and three dimensions. Section perspectives, axonometric
plans, or a hybrid of both can include all the information you need in one
simple drawing or model. What makes BIM so special when dealing with representation is that
BIM provides this with ease. In some sense, as soon as you start cutting into
the building, you are creating two dimensional drawings even if you are working
in a three dimensional model. The plans,
sections, and elevations are still there, but they are just represented in
conjunction with other things.
No comments:
Post a Comment